In this exercise we will consider only the jurors who had voted in ballots where the jury was split in 6 for ``guilty'' vs 6 for ``not guilty''. Of these jurors, 19 stated that they had no conscientious scruples against the death penalty. Of these 19 jurors 12 voted ``guilty'' on the first ballot, the remaining 7 voted ``not guilty'' on the first ballot.
Are jurors without scruples against the death penalty more likely to vote ``guilty''? Let X denote the number of ``guilty'' votes among these n=19 jurors and let p be the - unknown - probability of a ``scrupleless'' juror voting ``guilty'' on the first ballot. We will try to settle the question about ''scrupleless jurors'' by looking at the probability distribution of X.
Use the pdf command to answer Question 1:
pdf; binomial n=19, p=0.5.The pdf command will print out P(X=k) for k=1,...,19. All you have left to do is copy the numbers from the screen.
Click here for an answer.
You might find the cdf command helpful:
cdf; binomial n=19, p=0.5.The output gives probabilities of the type P(X < k), k=0,...,19.
Click here for an answer.
The question can be answered by finding the 10-th percentile of the normal distribution with mean $\mu =30,000$ and standard deviation s=5000. We could use the normal table in the book to find the 10-th percentile of the standard normal distribution and then transform to the 10-th percentile of the normal distribution with m=30000, s=5000. by using an inverse z-transformation. Alternatively use the invcdf command in Minitab:
invcdf 0.10; normal mu=30000, sigma=5000.Or we could have used the cdf command to find P(X<25,000).
cdf 25000; normal mu=30000, sigma=5000.
Click here for an answer.