For the given data, [`X] = 3, [`Y] = 80, åxy = 70 and åx2 = 10, so that
b =
å
xy
å
x2
=
70
10
= 7
a =
_ Y
- b
_ X
= 80-7·3 = 59 ,
and the estimated regression line is
^ Y
= 59 + 7 X .
Here is the graphic. The only points of interest here
are the ones marked with a ``·'' .
[^Y] = 59+7·3 = 80; this corresponds to the
point marked with an ``o'' in the previous graph.
[^Y] = 59+7·4 = 87; this corresponds to the
point marked with an ``&'' in the previous graph.
This corresponds to the estimated slope of the
regression line, b = 7.
11-3
Here, b = åxy /åx2 = 876/97 » 9.031 and
a = [`Y]-b[`X] » 160 - 9.031·4.6 = 118.457, so that
the estimated regression line is [^Y] = 118.457 + 9.031 X.
For a radiation exposure of 5.0, we estimate the
cancer mortality to be [^Y] = 118.457 + 9.031·5 = 163.612. For a radiation exposure of zero, the estimated cancer
mortality is the estimated intercept, a = 118.457.
The answer to b. with zero exposure is marked
with an ``&'', the answer to part b. with exposure 5.0
with an ``o'' and the counties with a ``·''.
Since the data arises from an uncontroled
observational study, one can not conclude for any causal
relationship between radiation exposure and cancer mortality. It can
be the case that the observed positive relation between the two
variables is due to the presence of some confounding variable.
11-5
a. mean; b. normal; c. easy; d. OLS, curve.
12-13
Since t = b/SE and SE = .27/t.025, we get t = 2.76. Also the
hypotheses is H0: b £ 0, so 0.0025 < p-value < 0.005. Note that
we used a normal standard table since the sample size is large:
n = 1000.
Extra Exercise
We have n = 32, so that df = 30 and t.025 = 2.05.
b
=
b ±t.025 SE
=
102.289 ±2.05 ·24.23
=
102.289 ±49.43
52.86 < b < 151.72
a
=
a ±t.025 SE
=
-6553.57 ±2.04 ·1661.96
=
-6553.57 ±3390.40
-9943.97 < a < -3163.17
Yes, since the 95% confidence interval for b
does not contain zero.
The hypotheses to test is H0: b = 100, so the t
statistic is
t =
b-100
SE
=
102.289-100
24.23
= 0.094.
We want to calculate a two-sided p-value, so, looking at the table, we
recognize that p-value > 2·0.25, that is, the p-value is larger
than 50%.
Looking at the output tables, we see that s2 = 18761.24.
File translated from TEX by TTH, version 2.00. On 24 Nov 1999, 11:11.