STA110A Final Computing Assignment
Newcomb's measurements of the speed of light
Background Material
Verification of the fact that light travels at a finite velocity, and
is not transmitted instantaneously as early scientists ( including
Kepler and Descartes ) had thought, is generally credited to Ole Romer,
who in 1676 made comparative measurements of the time of eclipses of
Jupiter's satellites from two different relative positions of Earth
and Jupiter. But another two centuries passed before the experiments
of Michelson and Newcomb in 1879-1882 provided what are considered the
first accurate determination of the velocity of light in vacuum.
In 1849 and 1850, the French physicists Fizeau and Foucault had
separately devised methods of measuring the velocity of light.
Foucault's method, as refined and improved by Newcomb and Michelson,
was the source of the more accurate subsequent determinations. Foucault's
method consists in essence of passing light from a source
off a rapidly rotating mirror to a distant fixed mirror, and back to
the rotating mirror. The velocity of light is then determined by
measuring the distance involved, the speed of the rotating mirror and
the angular displacement of the received image from its source.
Below is a table showing Newcomb's measurements of the passage time it
took light to travel from his lab, to a mirror on the Washington
Monument, and back to his lab. The distance of the path traveled
is 7.44373 km. The primary goal of this experiment is to determine
the speed of light, and to quantify the uncertainty of the measurement.
Data Set
Newcomb's 3rd Series of measurements of the passage time of light, made
July24, 1882 to Sep.5, 1882. The given values *0.001+24.8 are Newcomb's
measurements, reading down the columns, recorded in millionths of a
second. The entire table constitutes three data sets, each collected
on different days. The Excell datafile is obtainable
here.
Data Set 1 (n=20) | Data Set 2 (n=20)
| Data Set 3 (n=26) |
28 | -44 | 29 | 30 | | |
24 | 28 | 37 | 32 | | |
36 | 27 | 26 | 28 | 29 |
26 | 27 | 22 | 23 | |
| 20 | 25 | 25 | 36 |
| |
23 | 31 | 32 | 24 | 27 |
33 | 16 | 24 | 29 | |
| 36 | 21 | 28 | 26 |
| |
27 | 27 | 32 | 25 | 28 |
24 | 40 | 21 | 31 | |
| 32 | 28 | 26 | 30 |
| |
27 | 26 | 24 | 32 | 29 |
34 | -2 | 25 | 19 | |
| 36 | 29 | 30 | 22 |
| |
28 | 33 | 39 | 25 | 16 |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | 23 |
Data analysis assignment
In no more than two pages give a write-up
that includes the following:
- Confidence intervals for all three data sets (in km/sec).
- An overall confidence interval for the speed of light in km/sec.
- A plot showing the data and the confidence intervals.
In addition, the write-up should address the following questions:
- How does your analysis treat the outlier(s) in data set 1?
- Could there be sources of bias?
- The distance measurement of 7.44373 km is accurate
to 2 millimeters (0.00002 km).
Does this have a substantial effect on the confidence
intervals you computed?
Remember that you are allowed to work in groups (no more than 3) for
this assignment. The TA's and I will be happy to answer questions.
The assignment is due on 27 April at the end of class.